Note 9 exynos vs snapdragon reddit. Now, there can be discrepancies between Exynos and Snapdragon SoCs built on the same configuration (e. That gives the Exynos 2100 an edge on SPECint, too, as it scores 35. AMD battle that took the internet by storm in the last 1+ year. It has more efficient battery life and a more powerful GPU which has particular advantages for emulation in applications such as Dolphin. But can't accept it for What happened to Exynos? I remember back around the Note 4 launch, Exynos was the better performing chip since Snapdragon at the time was running really hot and draining more battery. After over a month with the UK Exynos N20U I finally decided to sell it and get a Snapdragon version from HK. As far as UI smoothness and performing daily tasks goes, Samsung has worked hard on improving the kernel for the Exynos one on the S9, and the Note 9 is even more well refined. GSMArena always only measures Exynos which showed outstanding results for the Note 9. Exynos has the upper hand when it comes to CPU performance, but Snapdragon has the better GPU. Citra might add Vulkan support and mikage is still in early development but it's very promising. I'm perfectly happy with it. I've recently upgraded from an Exynos Note 20 Ultra 5G to a S23+. I use the Audio Technica ATH-M50X (limited edition blue and bronze) and it sounds great. I live in Exynos region so the Note 20 and S21 I can get comes with Exynos chipset and only S20FE 5G has Snapdragon chipset. So i am debating on getting the Exynos 512 vs Snapdragon 128, with capability on running Genshin Imapct well is 1st priority (provided that if there is any difference) and storage 2nd priority. One of MANY reasons is the much better chip. One of the most prominent examples was the Exynos 8895 inside the Galaxy S8 and Note 8 Exynos 2100 VS Snapdragon 888 VS Snapdragon 865+ S21 ULTRA Note 20 Ultra Antutu 3DMark Geekbench 5 Archived post. Having good headphones is more important than the DAC difference between note 2 and 4. I had a few days with both and got between 9-10 hours SOT with Snapdragon and around 7-8 with the Exynos. That part sucks a shit ton. Not that this comes as a huge surprise, yet we sincerely hope that Samsung will be done with that split processing practice for the Galaxy S21 next year. Regardless, I pulled the trigger on a HK variant snapdragon note 10 plus last night. So no worries exynos owners In fact, Note 20 would have been made to be exclusively fitted with Snapdragon 865+ (alongside either the X55 (5G) modem, or X60 ones) like the mobile rest of its ecosystem (Z Fold 2 and Tab S7 series are powered with Snapdragon 865+), but this design team (and their determination) changed Samsung's mind, thus forcing the latter to use Exynos My last samsung before upgrading in 2023 was note 9 exynos - the battery was significantly degraded after 3 years, phone experience constant overheating with light use, even from just charging it. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS Note 20 Ultra Exynos vs Snapdragon . From my point of view Samsung alongside with the Exynos are on the right track right now, this Exynos vs SD "battle" is more or less like the Intel vs. Hoping the SD chip on my s23u holds up to many more years of use! Exynos had a few more bugs from the start and potentially a few more sample variation, but the average Exynos 2100 and Snapdragon 888 is pretty on par. the Exynos 2100 and S888 build on the same reference designs). At what point did Exynos fell so far behind Snapdragon? Curiously, the reason I'm looking for a new device is a mbo failure with my Poco X3 Pro, the infamous X3 hard brick. It's so funny this exynos vs snapdragon thing. 56mah per min during heavy-stress tasks of benchmarking. Android Authority implied SD845 Note 9 was slightly worse than other phones, but they didn't post measurements for it. My region is Exynos version, and both 128 and 512 are readily available, but for imported Snapdragon it only available as 128. Note that the Kirin really struggled at the last castle scene compared to the Exynos. It is a bit more polished but the main differences that are impacting me are the digital well being and even that isn't all that big a deal. They have started offering their much cheaper variants like the A and M series (M series is a product line only available in India I guess?), although they only come with a 730g, but I can definitely see a 800 series Snapdragon being better with their upper mid range product line. (Battery life, screen quality, features like new Bluetooth S-pen and wireless charging, camera image quality etc. S21U Exynos user in here. 2 inch version. I have a exynos version and it runs 60fps without any lag on fortnite mobile and pubg and call of duty and more runs 60fps-90fps with good graphics but sometimes is gets over heated This isn't a note 10+ to note 20 we're talking about. I've never had a problem. I saw some videos on YT showing that zoom is better and more stable on Exynos versions. One reviewer did a bunch of benchmarks at full resolution and noted the S24+ draining on average 6. Anticipated custom ROMs & dev support. I've used this phone in pretty much any weather including: negative °C in winter in Scotland very hot (40-45°C in Italy) summer Using it for social, camera (including long videos). I came to the Galaxy A54 5G from the Note 10 Plus. As far as I've read you'll get 10-15% more battery on the Snapdragon but I've also seen posts of Snapdragon getting comparable battery, 4 hrs SOT if you're unlucky and 5-6-7 if you're lucky. floating point operations, IO operations, and so on. I personally think the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 with Snapdragon 845 would be better than the Exynos variant. 0 S21 Snapdragon 888: 13,070 S21 Exynos 2100: 14,732 3D Mark Wildlife S21 Snapdragon 888: 5,733 S21 Exynos 2100: 5,852 GFXbench Aztec Ruins Vulkan S21 Snapdragon 888 (High): 35 fps S21 Snapdragon 888 (Normal): 55 fps S21 Exynos 2100 (High): 26 fps S21 Exynos 2100 (Normal): 35 fps The Note 9 is a tank, fast and reliable in late-2022 and I wouldn't be surprised to see the Note 9 holding up well next year. In theory, sampling could help. 11mah per min and the S24U draining 5. 21/9 example . About the temperatures i suggest watch Mrwhostheboss comparison video and see for yourself what is what. I really expected more parity between those phones and wonder why there is such a big difference? Is the Exynos Process that far behond Snapdragon's latest? Aug 10, 2018 · I'm hoping the battery life is not too dissimilar between the two variants, and either should be more than adequate (@ 4,000 mAh) for most users. The difference was less here since the test wasn't CPU intensive and a lot of power was consumed by the display. But generally the Snapdragon is better in the battery department. Now battery and heating (throttling) are a different story. The Exynos was trailing behind The audio quality on the note 2 is tiny bit better because if the Wolfson DAC but note 4 with exynos isn't too bad. But most of us will agree that an S22 ultra is a pretty damn big upgrade over a note 9. . My questions are: What are your opinions on the two for longevity? Is the Exynos noticeably slower than the Snapdragon (in day-to-day tasks)? How long will the phone stay fast on the stock OS for both Exynos and Snapdragon? In terms of longevity, ideally I'd want to keep this one for 3 years. 71, while the Snapdragon 888 lags behind at 31. Her phone showed better performance over time, but battery life was better on mine (even my using pattern tending to wear the battery faster, it still lasts longer than hers). GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. I have no regrets upgrading from note 2 to snapdragon Andrei got a turd Exynos in this review, and an unknown quality Snapdragon. My Note 9 is also getting hot randomly, super annoying, I should've knew since I had similar experience with Galaxy S6. I take a lot of pictures/videos and multitask - but don't really play any games (if I do, they're basic and only for like 5 minutes) - I can get an Exynos model, wireless charger Duo, and a Watch 3 cheaper than importing a Snapdragon variant, or getting the Fold - which should I go for? There will be more updates and the tide might shift more in one or the other direction (mostly Exynos I presume as Samsung always cannot get their SoC ready on time) but as seen in the video above, the Exynos got ahead when it comes to battery and heat efficiency whereas the Snapdragon was always better at it. With Exynos, compared to Snapdragon you have only the following real problems: Modem is worse than SD one. Only thing exynos has got going for it is the unlockable bootloader to do custom roms. The Kirin 980 took 1-2 seconds longer than the Exynos. There is way more to a SoC than raw CPU+GPU performance, modem, ISP, efficiency, etc. Why? So I've been planning on upgrading from my Note 9 though I wonder if I should just buy Samsung flagships locally (which offers Exynos chipsets) or import one which has a Snapdragon one? I've heard that latest Exynos chipsets are inferior compared to their Snapdragon counterparts, though each chipset has its own pros and cons. The Exynos variant was 10 seconds slower than the 855 and was stuttering. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Exynos Vs Snapdragon . Compression test: Snapdragon 855 and Kirin 980 are ahead, taking 5-6 seconds to complete the test. I love reading Reddit posts, and learning things about my S21 Ultra, however the Exynos vs Snapdragon debate is getting annoying and over the top. Battery life on my Exynos Note 9 is amazing, I had phones with better battery life in the past but this is the first time that battery on a flagship amazes me. g. Unfortunately it's Exynos but the performance and over all optimization of the chip is not bad. Reports of 7 hours sot from exynos users are probably using their phone for extended periods of time, meaning that the phone isn't in standby, and they are probably on WiFi. Also no proper 3ds emulation in exynos because they don't support Vulkan, only openGL. Aug 21, 2020 · So, yes, both Snapdragon vs Exynos Note 20 Ultra synthetic benchmarks, and real-life scenario battery tests return an advantage for the Snapdragon 865+ models over the global Exynos 990 variant. That annatech article on exynos breakdown few weeks ago made it easier for me. There was an incredible deal o the mate 20 pro and note 9 during black Friday in the UK. Especially because the Exynos is in a smaller device (S10 vs S10+) and they are at a process node deficit ("8nm" vs "7nm"). I can get an Exynos version slightly cheaper than the… S21 Snapdragon 888: 3,223 S21 Exynos 2100: 3,263 PCMark Work 2. In 2023, Samsung dropped Exynos variants (temporarily?) for the Galaxy S series (they still exist for the A series) and it also happens that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is an excellent chip, very fast and energy efficient, almost matching the iPhone records. Which is a shame, because after more than 1 year, the device is still a monster performance-wise. But yeah this happens every time stuff comes out. 84. So with that in mind, some kind of consistency would be nice. So far exynos 2400 is performing better for gaming on S24+ and slightly worse for battery and computing compared to Snapdragon on S24U. But the thing is the Exynos variant has more than double the internal base storage which would be awesome to have. It could very well be turd vs golden biasing this review. Hi, my Note9 screen cracked and is looking for a new phone. Snapdragon S10, S20, and s21 is better than the exynos version. Every year Apple comes with a chipset that scores higher on benchmarks, but people always say that day-to-day performance is almost identical to its competitors and we shouldn't care about benchmarks. This exynos is heavily gimped and its a shame the Uk gets this inferior version This is an honest review, I have had Samsung devices from my teen years; S4, S7, S9+ and ultimately S20+. Dual-SIM has an affect on power as well, Exynos having more Dual-SIM units than Snapdragon. Samsung truly betrayed me after a 6 year long being an advocate of their brand, and often would recommend a Samsung smartphone device to othersthe Exynos 990 is total trash, it keeps throttling after 1 hour of progressive intense gaming (pubg and codm), which even an Apple x would not Samsung is just on another lvl of scum and greed Who came up with this idea to upgrade snapdragon 865 in s20 ultra to the plus version in note but keep the shitty exynos 990 same like it is in all the other regions of the world How can a company get away by doing these kind of things?I have a snapdragon s20 ultra and had an exynos s20+ their gaming performance is literally generations apart. 8 GHz, versus the Snapdragon 888's 2. As someone whom likes to look at numbers and real world performance I must say that the A54 has been a Great replacement to the Note 10 Plus. Snapdragon has better performance peak and sustained and has much better battery life on average. Upgrading from 2018 Note 9 Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The Exynos Notes have a lot more battery drain issues and many folks are only getting between 5-7 hours SOT. It appears as if Single-SIM vs. Improve your Samsung Galaxy Note 9's (Exynos) battery life, performance, and look by rooting it and installing a custom ROM, kernel, and more. May 12, 2024 · The long-running Exynos vs Snapdragon rivalry came to a (temporary?) end with the Galaxy S23 series. When reports first started coming out about the Exynos chip being worse, most tech reviewers put the figure at about 20% worse in battery consumption. Exynos does heat up and throttle. I went for the mate 20 pro. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Aug 27, 2018 · When I received my N960F - a Note 9 from Clove in the UK, I ran the same Benchmark from ANTUTU and the best score I could get was 236,000 - a HUGE difference. There is a lot of hype between the two SoC and the superiority of the snapdragon. That bodes well for Exynos. Its mid cores, for example, are clocked at 2. I'm in the process of upgrading to the Note 9 from the S9 plus as I prefer bigger screens. When it comes to Snapdragon vs Exynos, people care so much about those numbers. Well damn! What do you expect! My 12 Pro Max did also! My snapdragon S9+ gave me 6-7hrs in the same conditions. Business, Economics, and Finance. The price: s21 - $827. Basically if you want to run decent big hitting mobile games you need the Snapdragon, as you saw on mrwhostheboss he ran a high performance test like ten times, the Exynos gets hotter much quicker and throttles it's performance way more than the snap, I await this same pain with the s22, I could import the snap version but then 5g won't work in the UK :( The Exynos is actually only half as efficient as the Snapdragon this year. I have read some articles were they have mentioned that exynos and snapdragon have different camera/ video configurations based on the chip set. Which variant is recommended in terms of: Ease of Rooting. Can't believe the differences straight away in performance, battery and thermals! I'm not saying I had a terrible time with the Exynos, it just pained me to know that it was an interior model to the Snapdragon. Yet Exynos apologists on this sub often defend Exynos saying there's no difference in real world usage. Let’s see how the Note9 fares: In our web browsing battery test, the Snapdragon and Exynos Note9 surprisingly end up Jan 26, 2019 · Coming from a Note 4, your new Exynos based Note will feel buttery smooth while delivering plenty of value in other areas as well. 75 (free smart tag, wireless charger convertible and UV Sterilizer with wireless charger) Unfortunate for people who can only get the Exynos version without jumping through a bunch of importing hoops I was rolling my eyes when I saw that thread about the shareholders getting mad about the Exynos performance, but I didn't know it was waaaaaay over 10%, jesus. Note 10+ wasn't a huge upgrade over note 9. There's not much or any difference between exynos and snapdragon versions. This is why benchmarks measure different aspects, e. ) Not specifically about the Note 9, but me and my wife both had S7 edges, I've had the Exynos and she had the Snapdragon. Update: after having 10 now it seems mostly flawless but there is one potential issue and one confirmed issues. The only aspect of the note 10+ that is superior to the s22 ultra is the SD card slot. The only advantage Snapdragon had was better community support. I'm buying a used Samsung Note 9, both handsets have been used for about 18 months. But is it worth it? On this article, apart from the camera, there is not much more to mind about if you are an Exynos note 10 user. Samsung had to disable the 4k60 recording for the Exynos variants of the Note 8 because the Snapdragon varients couldn't do it Edit: Exynos Note 9/S9 can also record 4k120 but again, it's been disabled because the Snapdragon varient can't do it Now with s22 ultra snapdragon 12gb variant I'm pretty satisfied in every way especially performance because s21 ultra with exynos would start lagging, stuttering pretty easily after I pushed it even a little with normal, everyday apps. 1 could be because I suspect the 9820 is using 2333mhz vs something likely slightly lower from Qualcomm. I also wouldn't go by early leaked benchmarks to judge the AMD collaboration yet considering the leaked bench of the newer Snapdragon is pretty bad too. Just wondering if anyone has info on how good the battery is for exynos compared to snapdragon. 42 GHz. Every few days there is the same question over and over with the same comments of: "Exynos is bad! I game for 4 hours and it heats up!". But note that the Snapdragon models were not far above, they were bad too. This has plagued Exynos every year, even when they are competing with Qualcomm's Snapdragon in performance, if you frequent the Samsung galaxy subs and forums, people always complain about the Exynos models more at launch. Exynos doesn't heat up as much as snapdragons 888 do. Also, I do want to say my Note 9 battery life is INCREDIBLE!!!! The battery is brand new in my Note 9 because of a screen replacement I did at a authorized center uBreakiFix, however the old battery didn't seem too bad Nonetheless they assert the "Exynos has better audio" has been a myth since recent times implying they probably looked at the Note 9 as well. 21/9 example Most of the Exynos 2100's high Geekbench and AnTuTu scores look to be down to its higher clock speeds. I have seen over the last several months the debate of the Exynos vs Snapdragon chips. The other thing is that the memory score is much much better on the Exynos. My country usually gets exynos versions so I was lucky to get a snapdragon variant for same price. Nov 26, 2018 · On the Galaxy S9s, the Snapdragon variant was always consistently higher. The Real Housewives of Atlanta; The Bachelor; Sister Wives; 90 Day Fiance; Wife Swap; The Amazing Race Australia; Married at First Sight; The Real Housewives of Dallas Samsung seriously needs to stop selling their S series with the Exynos in the Indian market. The difference, especially in battery life is slightly maddening. I have the Exynos it's still a good device but given the choice between Exynos or Snapdragon Note 9 you should choose SD. I am debating getting an s22 but I am in exynos (australia) region which have often been worse off compared to snapdragon version in terms of performance but more of a concern for me is battery tends to be worse off. This guy is getting better Exynos performance than Snapdragon maybe just because he didn’t get a turd bin Exynos I'm looking at getting a Note 20 Ultra or a Fold2 - preferring the Note but the Fold has the Snapdragon chip. Crypto. I was planning to get the samsung s24 6. Battery life is almost the same. Potential issue might be higher battery consumption but I wasn't monitoring befo All in all it's mostly a driver's issue this emulators not have shaking the best with Exynos. lkn fbu vxih nythm jbponuv gdgv gggnpc qmzvdjn eacxemg smd